![]() Although dissolving the agency in its entirety may not be feasible or advisable at that, it stands that significant budget cuts are exponentially overdue, as well as more strict environmental guidelines and the redistribution of funds. Yet this does not exonerate NASA of its sins. I am not here to argue for the abolition or disbandment of NASA numerous government agencies rank above NASA on the list of dishonorable groups - the military, police and ICE stand out to me currently. An insufficient level of criticism, however, was and has yet to be directed toward the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the U.S.’s premier aeronautics and space program. and preventing more frivolous spending on the war industry. Space Force in 2019, a majority of those opposed catered toward goals of demilitarizing the U.S. With the entourage of criticism inspired by former President Donald Trump’s establishment of the U.S. Photo by Joe Burbank/Orlando Sentinel via AP The team practices recovery exercises using the capsule -called a Crew Module Test Article- which will be sent to San Diego for further training ahead of the planned 2024 launch of the Artemis II crewed mission to the moon. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.Members of NASA’s Orion crew recovery team, right, in red helmets, gather as the test capsule is hoisted out of the water during training for the Artemis II mission at Kennedy Space Center, Fla., Launch Complex 39, Monday, Feb. Some kind of change is needed in NASA plans, said Hubbard, a professor at Stanford University: "What we ended up with now is clearly unsustainable." It's an idea the panel and some in the Obama administration have discussed. ![]() The administration gave the agency an extra $400 million, however, as part of the stimulus package.įormer NASA associate administrator Scott Hubbard said if the United States invited other countries, including Russia and perhaps China, on the next space journey, it would keep America's costs lower. Obama cut $3 billion from projections for future spending on exploration, with even more cut when inflation is factored in, said Pace, director of space policy at George Washington University. 3 at NASA during the Bush administration. While the Bush administration cut some spending, the "real killer" came in Obama's first budget, which starts in October, said Scott Pace, the No. He added that the previous NASA administrator "tried cannibalizing NASA (to pay for exploration) but that wasn't enough." "Bush never delivered on his promise to up NASA's funding," Stern said. "NASA has been like a star athlete that's broken world records back in the 1960s and is stuck in the bleachers ever since, unable to suit up for what it does best," said space scientist Alan Stern, who quit last year as NASA's associate administrator for science.īut, as has been the case since about 1971, money is holding engineers back, Stern said. That rocket will be taller than the space shuttle, illustrating an agency eager to launch something new. The full test rocket, complete with a dummy crew capsule and escape system, Ares I-X, is supposed to get a launch test at Kennedy Space Center on Oct. That test is of the main get-off-the-ground engine in the Ares I rocket. ![]() Thus, the first big test of moon program hardware is the rocket stage firing Thursday in Promontory, Utah. Until NASA is told to change course, it will continue with the Bush plan. The panel will not tell the president which choice to make. A lot of the assumptions made in 2004 (for the Bush plan) have just not materialized." "The problem is the size 14 foot in the size 10 shoe," said American University public policy professor Howard McCurdy, author of several books about the American space program.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |